Could Bears Expand Their Range?

Featured Image. Credit CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Andrew Alpin

Picture this: a grizzly bear wandering through territory it’s never called home before. This isn’t some fairy tale scenario anymore. Across North America, bears are steadily pushing into new territories, driven by forces beyond their control and beyond what most people realize.

Climate change has become the invisible hand guiding these massive creatures into landscapes they’ve never explored. From polar bears forced off melting ice to black bears discovering suburban neighborhoods, the continent’s bear population is on the move. The question isn’t whether bears are ing their range but rather how fast and how far they’ll go.

Climate Change Forces Arctic Giants South

Climate Change Forces Arctic Giants South (Image Credits: Wikimedia)
Climate Change Forces Arctic Giants South (Image Credits: Wikimedia)

The Arctic warming saga tells the most dramatic story of bear range expansion. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment have both predicted that the Arctic is extremely vulnerable to projected climate change. The most pronounced changes to the Arctic are likely to include increased temperatures and changes in precipitation patterns: both which will affect sea ice patterns and ultimately, polar bears.

Polar bears rely on sea ice to hunt, breed, roam, and sometimes to den. But the Arctic is warming and ice is melting due to human-caused climate change. Already, in parts of the Arctic, longer ice-free seasons and longer fasting periods have led to a decline in some polar bear populations. These bears now face an impossible choice: starve on disappearing ice or venture into unfamiliar territories in search of food.

In addition to being less hospitable for polar bears, a warmer Arctic will create opportunities for southerly species to move north, potentially exposing bears to more pathogens, new diseases or increased competition. This creates a domino effect where changing conditions push both arctic and temperate species into new confrontations.

Black Bears March Into New States

Black Bears March Into New States (Image Credits: Rawpixel)
Black Bears March Into New States (Image Credits: Rawpixel)

While polar bears struggle with shrinking habitat, American black bears are experiencing the opposite phenomenon. The wild American black bear continues to expand its range further south into Lower Michigan, the DNR reports. But the Michigan Department of Natural Resources said during the past 20 years, bears also have been migrating into the Northern Lower Peninsula. This expansion represents more than just wandering individuals.

The bears in the Northeastern part of the state having only shown up in recent years and have moved into the state from Northwest Georgia. Indications are that the black bear population in Alabama is slowly increasing. These movements signal genuine range expansion, not temporary dispersal.

The results from a 2008 survey of eastern United States and Canadian Provinces that actively manage black bear populations indicated that 75% of these jurisdictions report an increase in bear range. Wisconsin’s occupied bear range is expanding, which means residents can expect to see black bears in areas outside of the bear’s traditional range. The scale of this expansion becomes clear when looking at population numbers over decades.

Population Explosions Drive Territory Growth

Population Explosions Drive Territory Growth (Image Credits: Flickr)
Population Explosions Drive Territory Growth (Image Credits: Flickr)

Bear populations aren’t just shifting; they’re exploding in many regions. Wisconsin’s black bear population is considerably higher than it was 30 years ago. Wisconsin’s bear population was estimated to be about 9,000 bears in 1989. The most recent data indicates the bear population is currently estimated to be a little over 24,000 bears.

Mississippi’s Black Bear population is thought to be over 150 bears. In 2002, experts began taking a closer look at the black bears in Mississippi and at that time there were believed to be less than 50 bears in the state. Due to the addition of several females, the population has been growing and has tripled as of 2024.

These aren’t isolated success stories. There are now about 2,000 bears living in Lower Michigan locales such as Traverse City and Grand Rapids. Growing populations naturally require more territory, pushing bears into previously unoccupied areas.

Grizzlies Push Into Uncharted Territory

Grizzlies Push Into Uncharted Territory (Image Credits: Unsplash)
Grizzlies Push Into Uncharted Territory (Image Credits: Unsplash)

The grizzly bear expansion story differs dramatically from their black bear cousins. Once ranging widely from Mexico to Alaska, these iconic predators occupy a fraction of their historical territory. Despite habitat loss, human conflict, and climate change, grizzly populations have remarkably recovered in recent decades. Their story highlights conservation success and ongoing challenges as bears and humans navigate a shared landscape.

Inuvialuit hunters and trappers say grizzly bears are showing up in increasing numbers on islands of the Beaufort Sea and experts say climate change is likely a driving factor. The movement of the grizzlies in the North is significant because it’s part of a wide scale expansion, he said. “That’s not the only part of Canada where grizzlies are expanding their range,” he said.

But they have been expanding their range northward for several years, he said. One area seeing more grizzlies is the west coast of Hudson Bay, including Wapusk National Park near Churchill, Man., best known for its roaming polar bears. This northward push puts grizzlies in direct contact with polar bear territory for the first time in modern history.

Human Development Creates New Challenges

Human Development Creates New Challenges (Image Credits: Flickr)
Human Development Creates New Challenges (Image Credits: Flickr)

Bear range expansion collides head-on with human development patterns. Grizzly bears naturally require large home ranges – adult males may use territories spanning 300-500 square miles. As human development expands into previously wild areas and recovering grizzly populations reoccupy historic territories, the zones where humans and bears interact have increased dramatically.

Black Bears prefer living in forests and mountainous areas where there is an abundant source of food, water, and shelter. Human populations are expanding into bear territories causing more and more bear and human interactions. This creates dangerous situations for both species.

Equally worrying is that bears with inadequate natural food sources are more likely to wander into human communities to forage. As human populations expand and encroach on dwindling wild bear habitats, the interface between human settlements and bear territory is increasing. Combined, all of these factors increase the chances of human-bear conflict. The consequences often prove fatal for bears rather than humans.

Food Scarcity Drives Desperate Wandering

Food Scarcity Drives Desperate Wandering (Image Credits: Flickr)
Food Scarcity Drives Desperate Wandering (Image Credits: Flickr)

Climate change affects more than just habitat boundaries; it fundamentally alters food availability. Climate change is impacting the food availability and hibernation cycles of bear populations around the world, threatening the survival of bear species. When traditional food sources become unreliable, bears venture into new territories seeking alternatives.

Bears are highly intelligent and opportunistic omnivores with exceptional memory and sense of smell. They quickly learn to associate humans with food when they discover anthropogenic food sources. Unsecured garbage bins and dumpsters become reliable feeding sites.

That makes it more likely that residents and businesses will see a bear, the DNR said, especially during the spring when the animals are hungry. The detail to remember is that the bears are looking for food. Hunger becomes the primary driver pushing bears into unfamiliar territories where they inevitably encounter human settlements.

Hybrid Bears Signal Overlapping Territories

Hybrid Bears Signal Overlapping Territories (Image Credits: Wikimedia)
Hybrid Bears Signal Overlapping Territories (Image Credits: Wikimedia)

Perhaps the most striking evidence of changing bear ranges comes from an unexpected source: hybrid bears. As climate change causes sea ice to melt and polar bears to move inland, their territories have started to overlap with those of grizzly bears, leading to the birth of these hybrid bears.

The grolar bear, also known as the pizzly bear, is the product of a mating between a polar bear and a grizzly bear. This crossbreeding occurs when the habitats of polar and grizzly bears overlap, usually due to polar bears being pushed southward as sea ice melts, bringing them into contact with grizzlies. According to a 2024 study, all known wild grolar bears (only eight of which have been confirmed to date) descend from a single female polar bear and multiple male grizzly bears.

As climate change continues to reshape the Arctic and the habitats of polar and grizzly bears overlap even more, these hybrid bears could become more common. These living proof points demonstrate how dramatically bear ranges are shifting across the continent.

Genetic Challenges in Northern Populations

Genetic Challenges in Northern Populations (Image Credits: Wikimedia)
Genetic Challenges in Northern Populations (Image Credits: Wikimedia)

Not all bear populations adapt equally well to changing conditions. Researchers from leading institutions including Polar Bears International, Environment and Climate Change Canada, the San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, the University of Manitoba, and MacEwan University have analyzed all of Canada’s polar bear populations and found that the most northern polar bears, those in Canada’s High Arctic, are less likely to be able to adapt to a rapidly warming Arctic. With the Arctic warming up to four times faster than the rest of the planet, and polar bears reliant on sea ice to reach their seal prey, the authors find that many polar bears are genetically unsuited for future warming.

High Arctic (>68 °N) polar bears (including parts of northern Nunavut and the Northwest Territories): These subpopulations have lower genetic diversity, which reduces their potential to adapt to climate change. This genetic bottleneck may force these populations to seek new territories or face local extinction.

Low Arctic (55-68 °N) and sub-Arctic (<55 °N) polar bears (based in Ontario and Manitoba – including Churchill, Canada, the polar bear capital of the world): While polar bear populations in the Hudson Bay area have significantly declined, for example Western Hudson Bay’s polar bears decreased 27% between 2016-2021, they may be more genetically suited to climate change thanks to their extensive exposure to warm temperatures – whereas High Arctic bears haven’t experienced the same conditions.

Management Strategies Influence Movement Patterns

Management Strategies Influence Movement Patterns (Image Credits: Unsplash)

Management Strategies Influence Movement Patterns (Image Credits: Unsplash)

Human management decisions directly affect where bears can and will expand their ranges. In an extreme situation, the DNR will trap and relocate a bear into the woods. The agency does that about six times a year. But suitable wild habitat is becoming scarce. This scarcity forces bears to push boundaries in search of available territory.

DNR manages bear population size through regulated hunting. The number of hunting permits have steadily increased following studies showing higher numbers of bears. In the near future, opportunities will be provided to the public to comment on the desired numbers of bears in each of the state’s bear management regions as the DNR prepares a new bear management plan.

Despite these challenges, the overall trend indicates positive recovery and range expansion for grizzly bears in the lower 48 states, sparking discussions about potential delisting from the Endangered Species Act. Such decisions remain contentious, influenced by human-wildlife conflict and habitat connectivity. Management policies will ultimately determine how far and how fast bear range expansion continues.

Future Projections Paint Uncertain Picture

Future Projections Paint Uncertain Picture (Image Credits: Pixabay)
Future Projections Paint Uncertain Picture (Image Credits: Pixabay)

Looking ahead, bear range expansion appears inevitable but unpredictable. Research shows that without action to greatly reduce carbon emissions and stabilize our climate, we could lose all but a few polar bear populations by the end of the century. This stark prediction suggests polar bears will continue pushing into new territories until they can no longer survive anywhere.

Climate change is likely to wipe out two polar bear populations on northern Canada’s Hudson Bay as warming temperatures usher in more ice-free days than the bears can survive. Such population losses will force surviving bears into increasingly desperate searches for suitable habitat.

A few subpopulations of bears who range in areas of naturally high productivity or in regions with thicker, multi-year ice may be insulated from the worst risks in the short term. These refugia may become launching points for expansion into previously unoccupied territories as other populations face extinction.

Bears expanding their range represents both conservation success and looming crisis. Black bear populations recovering from historical lows now venture into territories they haven’t occupied for generations. Grizzly bears, slowly climbing back from near extinction, reclaim ancestral lands while pushing into completely new areas. Meanwhile, polar bears flee disappearing arctic ice, desperately seeking any habitat that might sustain them.

The expansion isn’t uniform or predictable. Some species thrive and spread rapidly, while others face genetic bottlenecks that limit their adaptability. Climate change acts as the primary driver, but human development patterns, management decisions, and food availability all influence where bears will appear next.

What do you think about bears moving into new neighborhoods near you? Tell us in the comments.

Leave a Comment